UK COUNCIL DEBT — £154.6BN RECORD, WHO OWES WHAT, WHO RUNS IT

Full Ranking Table · Debt Per Resident · Political Control · Section 114 Failures · Reform UK Record · 2025-26 Data
£154.6bn
Total UK Council Debt — Record High 2025-26
£20,679
Woking Debt Per Resident — Highest in UK
£3.5bn
Birmingham — Most Indebted Council (ex-London)
121%
Rise in Council Debt Since 2009-10
£2,232
Average UK Council Debt Per Resident
11
Section 114 Notices Issued 2018-2023 (7 Councils)

UK council debt hit a record £154.6 billion in 2025-26 — more than double what it was in 2009-10. That £154.6 billion is sitting behind 407 councils across the UK, and ultimately behind every taxpayer in those areas. Seven councils have issued eleven Section 114 notices since 2018 — effectively declaring bankruptcy. This page shows exactly which councils owe what, who has been running them, and what the debt means per person on the ground. It also examines Reform UK's record in the councils they now control — the genuine achievements and the honest caveats.

PARTY KEY

Political Control — How to Read This Page

Every council in the tables below has a party badge showing who has been predominantly running it since 2010 (for the overall total debt figures) or who is running it now (for the current situation). The debt accumulated over many years, so current control does not always explain the debt level — some councils recently changed hands.

Labour Conservative Reform UK Lib Dem SNP No Overall Control Government Commissioners
⚠️ Important context: Comparing councils by total debt alone is misleading — Birmingham is larger than Woking. The fairest comparison is debt per resident, which accounts for the size of each authority's population. Both measures are shown. Large councils with high absolute debt are not necessarily badly run — some debt funds legitimate infrastructure. The scandals arise where debt per resident is extreme relative to the council's size and income.
⚠️ Council Debt Per Resident — Worst 20 Councils in the UK (2025-26)
Source: TaxPayers' Alliance / MHCLG 2025-26 data. UK average: £2,232. Bars coloured by political control.
£0 £5,000 £10,000 £15,000 £20,000 Council debt per resident (£) Woking (Commissioners) £20,679 Spelthorne (NOC) £10,000 West Dunbartonshire (SNP) £9,623 Thurrock (Commissioners) £8,500 Warrington (Labour) £7,198 Slough (Labour) £5,100 Croydon (Labour) £4,400 Edinburgh (Labour) £4,200 Nottingham (Labour) £4,100 Newcastle (Labour) £3,700 Leeds (Labour) £3,400 Birmingham (Labour) £3,200 Bristol (Labour) £3,100 Manchester (Labour) £3,100 Coventry (Labour) £2,900 Cardiff (Labour) £3,000 Liverpool (Labour) £3,000 Glasgow (SNP) £2,750 Sheffield (Labour) £2,800 ← UK avg £2,232
Woking (Gov commissioners) Labour-led Conservative-led Reform UK-led
03 — THE RANKING TABLE

Top 25 Most Indebted Councils — Total Debt 2025-26

Excludes Greater London Authority bodies (TfL £14bn, GLA £4.7bn — shown separately below). Ranked by total debt. Political control reflects predominant control since 2010 / current control.

# Council Nation Party Control Total Debt Debt / Resident Status / Notes
1Birmingham City CouncilEnglandLabour£3.50bn£3,200S114 issued 2023. Equal pay dispute £760m. Under monitoring.
2Leeds City CouncilEnglandLabour£2.70bn£3,400Largest Labour council. Claims debt "affordable".
3Woking Borough CouncilEnglandCommissioners£2.20bn£20,679S114 June 2023. £96m MRP deferred. Needs £171m govt bailout. Was Conservative.
4City of Edinburgh CouncilScotlandLabour£2.20bn£4,200Major infrastructure programme.
5Manchester City CouncilEnglandLabour£1.70bn£3,100Capital regeneration programme cited.
6Glasgow City CouncilScotlandSNP£1.70bn£2,750Large authority. Legacy equal pay costs.
7Sheffield City CouncilEnglandLabour£1.60bn£2,800Improving overspend position. Still "fragile".
8Thurrock CouncilEnglandCommissioners£1.50bn£8,500Intervention Failed commercial investments. Was Conservative.
9Liverpool City CouncilEnglandLabour£1.40bn£3,000Previously under government intervention (since lifted).
10Bristol City CouncilEnglandLabour£1.35bn£3,100Housing and transport investment debt.
11Nottingham City CouncilEnglandLabour£1.30bn£4,100S114 2023. Robin Hood Energy collapse. Under monitoring.
12Spelthorne Borough CouncilEnglandNOC£1.00bn+~£10,000Intervention MHCLG. Over-leveraged commercial property. Cutting debt by £360m via asset sales.
13Newcastle City CouncilEnglandLabour£1.10bn£3,700Capital programme largely transport and housing.
14Coventry City CouncilEnglandLabour£1.05bn£2,900Regeneration and transport schemes.
15Cardiff CouncilWalesLabour£1.00bn£3,000Largest Welsh council. Capital investment.
16Warrington Borough CouncilEnglandLabour£1.85bn£7,1983rd worst per capita. Commercial property investments.
17West Dunbartonshire CouncilScotlandSNP£0.92bn£9,6232nd worst per capita in UK. Small council, very high relative debt.
18Slough Borough CouncilEnglandLabour£0.76bn£5,100S114 2021. Under monitoring. Major restructuring.
19Middlesbrough CouncilEnglandLabour£0.34bn£2,400Previously under government commissioners (lifted 2024).
20Croydon London BoroughEnglandLabour£1.60bn£4,400S114 ×3 (2020, 2021, 2022). Largest borough bankruptcy. Restructuring ongoing.
—Transport for LondonEnglandLabour£14.0bn—GLA body — most indebted local body in UK. Sadiq Khan era expansion.
—Greater London AuthorityEnglandLabour£4.70bn—GLA body. Andy Burnham era infrastructure debt (Khan/Burnham).

Source: TaxPayers' Alliance / MHCLG 2025-26 data. Political control: "predominant since 2010" for accumulated debt figures. S114 = Section 114 notice (effective bankruptcy). Intervention = government commissioner intervention. Some councils dispute debt comparisons citing different responsibilities and funding arrangements.

🚨 The political pattern — stated honestly: Of the 25 councils with debts above £1 billion, 17 have been predominantly Labour-run since 2010, according to TaxPayers' Alliance analysis of MHCLG data. The three most dramatic failures (Woking, Thurrock, Spelthorne) were all Conservative-run councils that collapsed under commercial property investment strategies. The two biggest Section 114 cases are Birmingham (Labour) and Woking (Conservative). Debt accumulation is not exclusively a party political problem — it is a structural problem in how councils are funded, what they are required to spend on (social care, SEND) and what investment strategies they pursued in the low-interest-rate era.
04 — COUNCIL FAILURES

The Worst Cases — What Actually Went Wrong

🔴 Woking Borough Council — £20,679 Per Resident Now: Commissioners

The most extreme debt per resident of any council in the UK — more than double the next worst (West Dunbartonshire at £9,623). Woking accumulated £2.2bn of debt through speculative commercial property investment designed to generate income after central government grant cuts. It issued a Section 114 notice in June 2023. The council has deferred £96 million of minimum revenue provision (the amount it must set aside to repay debt) and needs £171 million of Exceptional Financial Support from government to stay functioning. Government commissioners are now in control.

Who ran it: Predominantly Conservative until government intervention. The investment strategy was approved under Conservative control.

🔴 Birmingham City Council — £3.5bn Total Labour

The largest council bankruptcy in UK history. Section 114 issued in September 2023. Birmingham's collapse was triggered by a longstanding equal pay dispute that generated claims of up to £760 million — costs that had built up for years and were not adequately budgeted for. Total debt at £3.5 billion is almost double the council's annual revenue budget. Birmingham is the UK's second-largest city, so while £3.5bn is the highest absolute total, the per-capita figure (c.£3,200) is less extreme than Woking.

🟠 Thurrock Council — £1.5bn Now: Commissioners

Thurrock ran up £1.5bn of debt through a series of high-risk commercial investments — solar energy loans, property deals — that generated significant losses. A government-commissioned report found "serious mistakes by individuals and self-sustaining systemic weaknesses." Government commissioners were appointed and remain in control. Thurrock was Conservative-run when the investment strategy was pursued.

🟠 Nottingham City Council — £1.3bn Labour

Section 114 issued in November 2023. Nottingham set up Robin Hood Energy — a municipal energy company — which collapsed at a cost of approximately £38 million. Separately, the council over-spent its housing revenue account and failed to balance its budget. The council also faced significant equal pay costs. It is now subject to government monitoring directions.

🟠 Spelthorne Borough Council — £1bn+, ~£10,000/resident No Overall Control

Spelthorne borrowed over £1 billion — against a core spending power of just £13.5 million per year — to acquire commercial investment properties. The MHCLG Best Value Inspection in March 2025 found the financial model "not sustainable." Spelthorne is now pursuing a plan to cut debt by £360 million through asset sales, reducing the per-resident figure from ~£10,000 to ~£7,000. The investment strategy was approved under previous Conservative-majority control.

05 — REFORM UK RECORD

Reform UK's Council Record — The Genuine Achievements and the Honest Caveats

Reform UK took control of ten councils in the May 2025 local elections — including Kent, Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire and others. Their record after approximately one year is mixed: some real achievements in debt reduction and savings, offset by broken tax promises, rising social care pressures, and questions about whether claimed savings are genuine or routine budget adjustments.

✅ REFORM UK — WHAT THEY HAVE ACHIEVED

Leicestershire County Council — Debt at Lowest Recorded Level

In June 2026, Reform UK's Leicestershire administration paid off £26.9 million of high-interest debt inherited from the previous Conservative administration. Council officials confirmed this reduced the council's debt to its lowest level in recorded history — a genuine milestone that will save ongoing interest costs and free up revenue budget.

⚠️ Honest caveat: Leicestershire's own Capital Strategy (approved February 2025 under the previous administration) shows £84 million of new borrowing planned, with total debt projected to rise to £266 million by 2029. The council also faces a £118 million deficit by 2028-29, driven by spiralling SEND (special educational needs) costs. Reform's early repayment is a genuine win but the longer-term picture remains very challenging.

Kent County Council — £50m Loan Repaid 41 Years Early

Reform's Kent administration repaid a £50 million loan 41 years ahead of schedule in September 2025, saving £670,000 per year in interest. The council's long-term debt is projected to fall by around £80 million by the end of the 2025-26 financial year, taking total borrowing to approximately £600-650 million.

⚠️ Honest caveat: Despite pledging not to raise council tax during the 2025 election campaign, Kent raised council tax by 3.99% in its first budget. Reform says the national promise and the council decision are separate — critics call it a broken promise. Adult social care costs continue to rise, with care budget rising £78.1 million in 2026-27 alone.

Reform's Savings Claim — £700m Across 10 Councils

Reform's head of DOGE Richard Tice claimed in March 2026 that Reform-led councils had identified £700 million in savings — £325 million in 2025-26 and £400 million budgeted for 2026-27. Independent analysis by Local Government Chronicle found £330 million in 2026-27. By council: Derbyshire £55m (6.77% of budget — largest %), Kent £49m, Nottinghamshire £7m.

⚠️ Honest caveat: CIPFA (the public finance body) notes that "sound savings are a key element in every council's budget decisions, regardless of political makeup." Some of Reform's claimed savings include planned items, one-off or timing-shifted entries, and savings already in train before Reform took control. The net, recurring fiscal benefit is disputed. The savings are real but the headline figure is contested.
📋 The structural problem Reform cannot solve alone: The biggest driver of council financial distress is not political mismanagement — it is rising demand for adult social care and special educational needs (SEND) support, which is legally mandated spending that councils cannot reduce. The average council now spends 47% of its budget on adult social care and children's services — up 57% since 2015-16. This affects Reform-led councils just as severely as Labour or Conservative ones. Leicestershire faces a £118m deficit by 2028-29 driven by SEND costs. Kent's care budget rose £78m in a single year. No amount of efficiency savings fully addresses a structural demand problem of this scale.
06 — CONTEXT

How Did We Get Here? — The Three Routes to Council Debt

Route 1 — Commercial property gambling (2015-2020). When central government grants were cut after 2010, many councils borrowed cheaply (interest rates were near zero) from the Public Works Loan Board and invested in commercial property to generate income. 75% of all council debt — £116 billion — came from the PWLB. When interest rates rose, the debt became expensive. When commercial property values fell, the assets were worth less than the debt. Woking, Thurrock, Spelthorne and others collapsed this way. It was not exclusively a political failure — it was a rational response to a perverse funding incentive, pursued by Conservative and Labour councils alike.

Route 2 — Equal pay and legal costs. Birmingham's collapse was driven by equal pay claims going back decades. Similar costs have hit Glasgow, Sheffield and others. These are not discretionary — courts enforce them.

Route 3 — Social care cost explosion. SEND costs, adult social care, children's placements — all legally mandated, all rising faster than funding. Over 30 councils are at risk of Section 114 notices in the next two years according to the Local Government Association. This is the structural problem that no political party has fully solved.

⚠️ The £154.6 billion question: Taxpayers ultimately stand behind all of this debt. When a council issues a Section 114 notice, it does not disappear — it becomes Exceptional Financial Support from central government, funded by national taxpayers. The 29 councils that received £1.33bn of EFS in 2025-26 were being bailed out by the rest of us. Council debt is not someone else's problem.
Sources: TaxPayers' Alliance "Briefing: Local Authority Debt" July 2026 — £154.6bn record total, +£6bn/4.1% from 2024-25, doubled since 2009-10 (+121%); MHCLG local authority borrowing data 2025-26; Woking: £20,679/resident, S114 June 2023, £96m MRP deferred, £171m EFS needed (Runnymede LGR documentation); West Dunbartonshire: £9,623/resident; Warrington: £7,198/resident; Birmingham: £3.5bn, S114 September 2023, equal pay claims up to £760m; Leeds: £2.7bn; TfL: £14bn; GLA: £4.7bn; Edinburgh: £2.2bn; Thurrock: £1.5bn, government commissioners (was Conservative); Spelthorne: £1bn+, ~£10,000/resident, MHCLG Best Value Inspection March 2025 — "not sustainable", plan to cut £360m via asset sales; Nottingham S114 November 2023 — Robin Hood Energy collapse; Croydon S114 ×3 (2020, 2021, 2022); Slough S114 2021; 17 of 25 highest-debt councils predominantly Labour-run (TPA analysis); 10 of 25 raised council tax >5% last year; EFS: 29 councils received £1.33bn in 2025-26, 42 total since 2020-21; Reform UK: Leicestershire £26.9m paid off June 2026 — lowest debt in recorded history (Charlie Simpson/GB Politics X, June 2026); Capital Strategy shows £84m new borrowing planned and debt rising to £266m by 2029; £118m deficit projected 2028-29 (Leicestershire.news); Kent: £50m loan repaid 41 years early September 2025, £670k/year saving (shepwayvox.org budget report February 2026); Kent council tax raised 3.99%; Reform savings claim £700m (LGC analysis found £330m for 2026-27: Derbyshire £55m, Kent £49m, Nottinghamshire £7m); CIPFA Financial Resilience Index January 2026 — English LA external debt £106.9bn (England-only figure); CIPFA quote on savings being standard practice; Average council care spend 47% of budget, up 57% since 2015-16 (TPA); Factually.co Reform council record analysis May 2026. Not political endorsement of any party.
Sources: MHCLG · TaxPayers' Alliance · CIPFA · ONS · Council documents · Disclaimer · Not a political endorsement